| The North West development’s academic sector will include
modern research facilities, as well as one undergraduate and
two graduate colleges. Research facilities release about 25%
of the total carbon dioxide emissions of each campus in the UK,
but comprise a much smaller fraction of built space. Thus, the
research facilities at the site will release a significantly
larger amount of carbon dioxide per square meter of floor space
than the rest of campus.
The University of Cambridge currently gets 73% of its energy
from oil, coal, and natural gas, all of which release carbon
dioxide. If the current mix of fuel sources applies to the
North West site, there will be a need for large, and perhaps
unrealistic, increases in the efficiency of energy use or decreases
in energy demand. As a result, the design and policies implemented
at the site will need to reflect a concern simultaneously for
energy efficiency, energy demand and the mix of fuels underlying
provision of that energy.
Several policies that target energy efficiency can be implemented
in order to reduce energy use and make the development a Carbon
Reduction site. They include:
- Improve Heating Efficiency – The heating sector of
higher academic institutions accounts for an average of
49% of the total energy used in those institutions. It is
essential, therefore, that heating needs be minimized, energy
efficiency maximized and fuels used to provide heating release
as little carbon dioxide as feasible- requiring development
of some form of Renewables
Portfolio Standard. With respect to efficiency,
design and construction principles include:
- Use highly insulated
buildings with tall ceilings promoting natural ventilation
and daylight.
- Use efficient building materials such
as wide internal insulating block work, double-paned
glass and 200 mm thick roof insulation.
- Locate and orient
the building along the east-west axis with the longest
wall facing South, like University of East Anglia’s
Zuckermann
Institute of Connective Environmental Research.
- Employ
thermal distribution systems. The most prominent is
a Swedish-designed Thermodeck
system,
using thermal mass to provide balanced ventilation
and heating and cooling. The Elizabeth
Fry Building at the University
of East Anglia uses the Thermodeck system, resulting
in a total heating energy demand of 25 kW-hr/m2/year.
- Employ
a heat
exchanger to
increase the efficiency of heating systems. Such exchangers provide
for the efficient transfer of heat within fluids over a solid
surface, and are highly efficient in boilers,
furnaces, and other heating systems. For example, the heat
exchanger in the Geochem
building at Cornell University has an annual savings
of approximately 400,000 kW-hr and 298 tons of carbon dioxide compared
to standard designs without such an exchanger.
- Improve Cooling and Refrigerant
Efficiency – Cooling
and Refrigerant sources account for about 24% of a typical
research facility’s energy budget. One solution is
to employ a High-Efficiency
High Capacity Cooling and Refrigerant System.
For example, the system designed by the Environmental Technology
and Education Center in Alburqerque, NM, uses an innovative
compressor system with 30-40% cooling capacity and 10%
greater energy efficiency.
- Improve Equipment Efficiency – According
to a study at the University of Leicester, 12% of total
energy consumed by research laboratories is used by lab equipment,
apparatuses or machines requiring electric power. Two modest
changes are suggested here:
- Program computers for Sleep
Mode. Sleep mode conserves 80% of the energy that
would be used in a screen saver program or standard monitor
operation. At the University of Vermont, this program
is saving 1.6 million kW-hr/yr for 8,000 PCs on campus.
- Use
modern technology alternatives. A commitment to energy
efficient devices can have significant impacts. For
example, most exit signs use 17 watts each. A new exit sign technology
only consumes one quarter of a watt and saves 170,000
kW-hrs each year.
- Improve Lighting Efficiency – With readily available
solutions, buildings can decrease the total energy
consumed by lighting. Selected solutions include:
- Employ ultra-efficient
light bulbs. Using ultra T8 light bulbs increases
energy efficiency in lighting by 50% compared to the
use of 100-watt light bulbs with only 10% efficiency.
- Use
light sensor technology. According to a study by the
University of Michigan, a lighting scheme with light
sensor technology, such as automated blind and lighting
systems, can save 20-75% of energy in classrooms, 30-60%
in corridors, and 30-75% in restrooms.
- Increase Pumps
and Fans Efficiency – Pumps and fans
manage the flow of air or liquid within the infrastructure
of the buildings. Control of their operation is essential
to reduction of energy use. Possible improvements
include:
- Equip such systems with variable speed
control. Varying the shaft speed controls
on pumps and fans can reduce 20-50% of
the compressor electrical use.
- Plan for system
cohesiveness. The design, installation,
and use of pump and fan systems are key
factors in energy efficiency. The position
and location of pipes and ducts in relation
to the pumps and fans is imperative to efficiently transfer
fluid.
Other policies targeting energy source
can be implemented in order to reduce carbon
dioxide emissions per unit energy consumed.
They include:
- Solar Energy: Photovoltaic
Cells – A sustainable
photovoltaic facility provides carbon dioxide-free energy
for academic buildings. The 275 m2 of photovoltaic panels installed
on the roof of the Zuckermann Institute at the University
of East Anglia provide 33 kW of peak power.
- Combined Heat and Power
Facilities (CHP) – A Co-generation
Plant increases energy efficiency and reduces carbon
dioxide emissions, offering substantial environmental, economic and
social benefits, as well as security of energy supply. The CHP facility
at the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill provides one third
of the electricity and all of the heat for the campus,
reducing their carbon dioxide emissions by 10,620 tons
annually.
Summary Reduction of Carbon Dioixde Emissions With Implemented
Policies
The table below summarizes the percentage of energy use in
five sectors of the university buildings, and reduction in
carbon dioxide emissions that might be anticipated using the
policies described previously.
| Efficiency Measures |
% Of
Total Energy Used-Research Facilities |
Potential
Energy Efficiency Gain* |
Heating |
49 % |
35 % |
Cooling and Refrigerant |
24 % |
10 % |
Equipment |
12 % |
15 % |
Lighting |
9 % |
40 % |
Pumps and Fans |
6 % |
25 % |
For a complete description of sustainable
practices in the educational and research sector, see the 2004
Final Report. |
Cred in Cambridge:
Academic and Research | Residential
and Commercial | Industrial | Transportation |
Twinning
Cities-Twinning Universities | Modeling
the Cambridge Site

The academic and research buildings might be designed to meet
BREEAM standards, significantly
reducing associated energy use.
|